The science behind Frankly

Reading list

Frankly's read isn't a hunch. It stands on decades of research — and a fast-growing science — of how language is used to persuade, evade, and manipulate. Here's the shelf, the studies, and the talks it's built on.

Books
On bullshit and detecting it
  • Harry Frankfurt — On Bullshit (2005)

    The tiny, famous book that separates the liar (who hides the truth) from the bullshitter (who just doesn't care what's true). Frankly is built on this one distinction.

  • John Petrocelli — The Life-Changing Science of Detecting Bullshit (2021)

    A psychologist's practical, evidence-based toolkit for spotting the red flags — buzzwords, emotional language, confident vagueness.

  • Carl Sagan — The Demon-Haunted World (1995)

    Contains the beloved “Baloney Detection Kit” — the original skeptic's checklist for testing any claim.

On evasive and institutional language
  • William Lutz — Doublespeak (1989)

    The definitive book on language that pretends to communicate — corporate and political euphemism, dissected.

  • George Orwell — “Politics and the English Language” (1946)

    The classic essay on how vagueness hides meaning and dodges responsibility. Public domain, five-minute read, still devastating.

On persuasion, power, and belief
  • Robert Cialdini — Influence (1984) & Pre-Suasion (2016)

    The definitive work on the levers that make people say yes — the same levers behind manufactured urgency and false consensus.

  • Daniel Kahneman — Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)

    Why a fast brain accepts impressive nonsense without checking it — the mechanism under the fog.

  • Deborah Tannen — Talking from 9 to 5 (1994)

    How workplace talk quietly encodes power and status.

  • Amanda Montell — Cultish (2021)

    A sharp, modern look at how language creates belonging and pressure — from cults to companies to “we're a family here.”

On manipulation in relationships
  • Robin Stern — The Gaslight Effect (2007)

    The book that named gaslighting for everyday life.

  • Susan Forward — Emotional Blackmail (1997)

    The Fear–Obligation–Guilt levers behind guilt-trips and ultimatums.

  • Lundy Bancroft — Why Does He Do That? (2002)

    Reframes controlling behavior as entitlement, not temper.

  • George Simon — In Sheep's Clothing (1996)

    A field guide to covert-aggression tactics.

  • Evan Stark — Coercive Control (2007)

    The landmark work redefining abuse as a pattern, not an incident.

Studies & papers
  • Pennycook et al. — “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit” (2015)

    Proved, experimentally, that buzzword-salad gets rated as profound. Free to read in Judgment and Decision Making.

  • Littrell, Risko & Fugelsang — “The Bullshitting Frequency Scale” (2021)

    Separates persuasive bullshitting (to impress) from evasive bullshitting (to dodge) — the two flavors Frankly catches. In British Journal of Social Psychology.

  • The Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale — (2026)

    A validated measure of how susceptible people are to workplace BS — and how that susceptibility links to poorer decisions. The most Frankly-shaped study there is.

  • Freyd; Harsey et al. — DARVO (1997; 2017)

    The origin of DARVO, and the experiment showing it makes people doubt the real victim.

  • Paige Sweet — “The Sociology of Gaslighting” (2019)

    Reframed gaslighting as a power phenomenon. In American Sociological Review.

Talks & watch
  • Pamela Meyer — “How to Spot a Liar” (TEDGlobal, 2011)

    One of the most-viewed TED talks ever (30M+) on the tells of deception.

  • John Petrocelli — TEDx Talk on detecting bullshit

    The viral talk that became his book — a great 15-minute primer.

  • Jennifer Freyd — Talks on DARVO and betrayal trauma (via jjfreyd.com)

    Accessible explanations straight from the researcher who named the pattern.

How to read this responsibly

Frankly points to patterns these researchers documented — it doesn't diagnose anyone. The scientists are careful here, and so are we: a tactic in one message is something to notice and ask about, not proof of someone's character or the state of a relationship. Use it to think more clearly, not to convict.